The Star Tribune carries a remarkably biting piece by history professor Chuck Chalberg about Minnesota Senator Paul Wellstone’s broken promise not to seek a third senate term. Professor Chalberg is optimistic that Minnesota voters will do the next best thing–next best to Wellstone voluntarily keeping his promise–and involuntarily keep him from serving a third term.
This morning’s Star Tribune reports a poll showing Senator Wellstone with only a small lead after a month of brutal attack ads during which his opponent’s campaign has been invisible. The Strib also reports how the poll was conducted, stating that the poll results were adjusted by means of a mysterious formula “verified in past elections” to reflect the preferences of voters most likely to vote. The formula is proprietary and secret, like the formula for Coca Cola, only we can’t taste it ourselves or see with our own eyes how it has been “verified” in past elections. At Minneapolis’s City Center Mall, when the fire alarm is mistakenly sounded, the Center announces over its public address system that the alarm “has been verified as false.” Based on its past results, including the poll’s last pre-election 2000 Bush/Gore results, I think that’s probably the kind of verification the Star Tribune poll methodology has. But I am afraid that Wellstone will pull this race out.
-
-
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.