Here, courtesy of Fox News, is the transcript of a Fox interview with Paul Wolfowitz, Deputy Secretary of Defense. The best part of the interview, in my opinion, is the second half, in which Wolfowitz discusses post-war Iraq. If Wolfowitz’s views prevail, the coalition will run Iraq until it hands control over to a legitimate Iraqi authority. The U.N.’s role will be to provide humanitarian assistance. As to the role of French, German, and Russian companies in the re-building of Iraq, Wolfowitz’s delicious answer is that this is up to the legitimate Iraqi authority.
Unfortunately, as Rocket Man has pointed out, those less clear-headed than Wolfowitz seem determined to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory by “internationalizing” our policies for rebuilding Iraq. A good example of such thinking appears in this Washington Post piece by Senators Biden and Hegel. The two Senators see a role in Iraq for everyone — NATO, the EU, Arab nations in the region, the U.N., the World Bank — no matter how craven their actions have been. Biden and Hegel consider the U.N. to be the key because its endorsement of post-war policies will give cover to political leaders whose people opposed the war. But what policies would the U.N. (i.e., France, Germany, and Russia) endorse? Giving a say to leaders whose people oppose what we’re trying to accomplish in Iraq is clearly a losing proposition.
-
-
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.