Byron York NRO suggests that there’s a deal in the works whereby the Republicans would give up their demand that all current nominees receive an up-or-down vote, effectively abandoning a few of the nominees, in exchange for a promise of no future filibusters. It’s difficult for me to see the Democrats giving up the right to filibuster President Bush’s Supreme Court nominees, though. I would think that the liberal special interest groups would rather see the Dems go down fighting (if it comes to that) than to give away the ability to block future appointees, no matter how conservative, in exchange for the scalps of a few current nominees.
JOHN adds: I agree. What’s more, we have it on what should be good authority that Bill Frist remains committed to an up or down vote for all nominees. As long as the Republicans stick to that principle, they’ll be fine.
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.