Barack Obama and his legion of supporters in the MSM may not like the fact that Hamas supports his candidacy, or that John McCain and his supporters mention this fact. But it’s not difficult to understand why Hamas favors Obama. Consider this statement by Obama regarding Lebanon:
This effort to undermine Lebanon’s elected government needs to stop, and all those who have influence with Hezbollah must press them to stand down immediately. . . It’s time to engage in diplomatic efforts to help build a new Lebanese consensus that focuses on electoral reform, an end to the current corrupt patronage system, and the development of the economy that provides for a fair distribution of services, opportunities and employment.
The naivety of this statement is staggering. As Noah Pollak asks: “Does Obama understand that the people who ‘have influence with Hezbollah’ happen to be the same people on whose behalf Hezbollah is rampaging through Lebanon?” And does he really believe that Hezbollah and its sponsors can be pacified or neutralized by electoral reform, an end to corrupt patronage, and “fair” distribution of services?
Obama may well fail to comprehend the first point and believe the second, just as naive leftists of an earlier generation thought that Ho Chi Minh was, at root, an agrarian reformer. In any case, Pollak is correct that “Obama is rhetorically cornered; since his only prescription for the Middle East is diplomatic engagement, every disease gets re-diagnosed as something curable through talking.”
No wonder he’s Hamas’s man.
To comment on this post go here.