Way back in 1960, Leo Strauss wrote in the Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences that “Natural law, which was for many centuries the basis of the predominant Western political thought, is rejected in our time by almost all students of society who are not Roman Catholics.” In the decades since then, however, natural law has enjoyed a revival of sorts, and is implicated today in the rise of constitutional originalism at the Supreme Court.
Hadley Arkes
But it is also a confusing subject, because many so-called “new natural law” theories seem to concede too much to modern philosophy, as if the great tradition of natural law begins with Bentham. To be sure, the classical authors such as Aristotle, Cicero, and Aquinas were not simple thinkers on the subject, but their work tends not bog down with specialized jargon or abstruse theory.
One person stands out for reviving the older tradition of natural law and applying it to today’s controversies: Hadley Arkes, author of Mere Natural Law: Originalism and the Anchoring Truths of the Constitution. In this classic format conversation, I draw out the basics of the argument from Prof. Arkes, and extend the line of reasoning to today’s controversies about free speech and “cancel culture,” which are more confused than ever with the sudden eruption of anti-Semitism on college campuses.
Listen here, or from Ricochet when the link goes live, or from your other podcast sources.
P.S. And buy the book:
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.