Last week in the post “Get a load of Fani” I drew inferences regarding the issues of fact bearing on Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’s alleged affair with special prosecutor Nathan Wade. I inferred that the facts were as alleged.
Now comes Techno Fog to dig into the response filed by Mrs. Wade’s attorney to the motion to quash the subpoena he served on Willis in the divorce proceeding. At his site Mr. Fog has posted “Fani Willis’s Affair: There Are Receipts.” He draws on exhibits filed with the response of Mrs. Wade’s attorney (the response is posted here with the Washington Post story here). The exhibits add facts to support the inferences I drew. I thought interested readers might want to take a look.
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.