The Daily Chart: Where Are the Pronoun Police?

Terrific—a new thing for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to police in employment discrimination. A Canadian social scientist (the best kind, no doubt) is out with a paper that finds job applicants who include non-binary pronouns (like “they/them”) on their resumes get fewer call backs than normal people. Who woulda thunk it? Potential employers prefer to avoid hiring dramatists and schizophrenics.

The paper is Taryn versus Taryn (she/her) versus Taryn (they/them): A Field Experiment on Pronoun Disclosure and Hiring Discrimination. It concluded that “there is strong evidence of discrimination against applicants who disclose nonbinary ‘they/them’ pronouns: I find that doing so reduces positive employer response by 5.4 percentage points. . . There is also evidence that discrimination is larger (approximately double) in Republican than Democratic geographies.”

No wonder so many businesses are moving to red states.

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.

Responses