Stanley Kurtz follows the advice of Johnny Mercer and Hillary Clinton, and accentuates the positive he perceives in the Supreme Court’s University of Michigan preferential admissions decisions, in this piece for National Review Online. He argues that Justice O’Connor’s romance with “Mr. In-between” has created enough of a mess to provide hope to those who oppose blatant racial discrimination against white college applicants. Accordingly, Kurtz concludes by urging readers to contribute to the Center for Individual Rights so that it can carry on the fight.
Kurtz’s analysis is based on the proposition that “colleges and universities are incapable of running their preference programs in conformity with Grutter v. Bollinger. The achievement gaps that have to be overcome are so large that race simply has to be turned into a decisive factor
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.