Earlier this week, in my Weekly Standard column, I described how Columbia University seeks to limit dissent from the rabidly anti-Israeli teachings of its Middle East studies professors by funneling it into the university’s bureaucracy, where it can die a quiet death. Now we learn that Columbia isn’t interested in debate about its ban on ROTC, either. 65 percent of Columbia students voted to reinstate ROTC, absent since 1969. (Presently, Columbia students interested in serving their country through our armed services most do so at other schools). The University is stalling, citing the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy as the basis for its reservations.
A group called the Columbia Law School Center for the Study of Law and Culture is leading the opposition to reinstating ROTC. In today’s New York Post, Charles Millard recounts how Columbia professor Michael Adler, who supports bringing back ROTC but is willing to make common cause with opponents on aspects of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” offered to debate the issue in conjunction with the Center. However, the Center’s co-director Kendall Thomas responded that “a teach-in is being planned, which I believe will be a more productive use of the law school’s resources, and its members’ time.” Thus, no debate took place.
When it comes to debate, Columbia’s policy seems to be “don’t ask, we’ll tell.”
-
-
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.