of “being at the mercy of people in the Middle East and elsewhere, and. . .of being at the mercy of these large oil companies.” So she told her constituents in Elmira Heights, according to the Washington Post. She also complained that in the past 30 years (including, presumably, the eight during which her husband was president) we have “gone backwards” with respect to solving the country’s long-term energy problem.
Does this mean that Senator Clinton will support drilling in the small portion of the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge that sits on top of billions of barrels of oil? Will she support building and licensing nuclear power plants? Or will she just take shots at “big oil” and whine about how tired she is?
-
-
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.