According to Toobin:
Adwoa Yamoah, who participated in the competition after winning Miss Canada 2012, told [him] that Trump would drop by during rehearsals, chat up the contestants, and then note his preferences to Miss Universe Organization president Paula Shugart.
“He made comments about every girl,” Yamoah told Toobin. “‘I’ve been to that country.’ ‘We’re building a Trump Tower there.’ It was clear the countries that he liked did well. He’d whisper to Paula about the girls, and she’d write it down. He basically told us he picked nine of the top 15.”
Yamoah, whose image appears in this post, is not the only former contestant who feels aggrieved:
Kerrie Baylis, Miss Jamaica 2013, added, “the list [of Miss Universe finalists] looked like the countries that Donald Trump did business with, or wanted to do business with.” And Shi Lim, Miss Singapore 2013, also told Toobin, “The finalists were picked by Trump. He was really in charge. We called it the Trump card.”
According to a Miss Universe spokeswoman, pageant rules allowed the company’s staff, including Trump, to participate in naming the finalists. As Ronald Reagan once said, “I am paying for this microphone.”
It would be bad form, though, for Trump to select finalists based on whether he was doing business, or wanted to do business, in the country from which a contestant haled. Did he?
It is possible, I think, to determine whether a correlation exists between nations finalists represented and nations where Trump had business interests. This sounds like a good assignment for John.
Toobin does not appear to have performed such an analysis (he does say that “finalists usually came from countries where Miss Universe had strong television ratings — a different and perhaps more plausible conspiracy theory for which he also presents no evidence). Thus, as good as Miss Canada looked, the allegations of the three former contestants may just be sour grapes.
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.