Second night

Kamala Harris was the hands-down winner of night two of the Democratic debates, in my opinion. She was ahead on points even before she went after Joe Biden for waxing nostalgic about his collaboration with racist Senators on anti-busing legislation. With that attack, she clinched her victory.

I’m not sure any other candidate helped himself or herself appreciably tonight. However, I think Pete Buttigieg got himself back on track. He was, I think, the most consistently intelligent and thoughtful candidate on stage. If I’m right that his candidacy was in danger of falling by the wayside, I think I’m right in saying that tonight, at a minimum, he stopped the bleeding.

Here are my thoughts about all ten performances:

Joe Biden: In the first half of the debate he looked old and tired. He seemed to be mailing his performance in. When the moderators asked for shows of hands in response to specific questions, they couldn’t even tell whether Biden had raised his.

Biden came to life in the second half of the debate, but only after Kamala Harris attacked him on civil rights. Biden gave a spirited defense of his civil rights record. Harris will be deemed the winner of the exchange, and correctly so. But Biden benefited from the adrenaline shot her attack seemed to provide.

Overall, though, it wasn’t a good night for Biden. I’m pretty sure he will retain his status as the frontrunner, but he looks vulnerable. And now that his nose has been bloodied, he will be attacked relentlessly going forward.

Bernie Sanders: Bernie was Bernie, the same guy we saw in 2015-16. The energy, forcefulness, and unabashed leftism that made him the darling of almost half the party are still there. They stand in contrast to Biden’s intermittent sleepiness.

This isn’t 2015-16, though. This time, Sanders faces competition in the left lane of the party. But if he falters it will be because time has moved on, not because of anything he did tonight.

Pete Buttigieg: Tonight, he looked and sounded like the guy who soared to third place (briefly) in the polls by intriguing young voters who want a fresh and intelligent liberal candidate. I think his performance will enable him to hold onto to his existing support, but I’m not sure he will expand it.

Buttigieg had to defend his handling of the recent case in which a South Bend police officer killed a black man who ran at him with a knife. I think Buttigieg did as well as he could do on this matter in the debate. However, the case is likely to keep haunting him.

Kamala Harris I have written that Harris seemed not to have “found her voice.” If true, she found it tonight.

What really distinguished her was not her talking points, though many of them were quite effective, but rather that she was able to project warmth and humanity. I can’t stand Harris, but found her likable tonight even as she was wielding the knife.

Will Harris get a boost from her performance? I think so. How much of one? I don’t know. At whose expense? Maybe Elizabeth Warren’s.

Kirsten Gillibrand: No one tried harder tonight than Gillibrand. She might have made headway too, had it not been for Harris, who was standing next to her.

Unlike Harris, Gillibrand projected zero warmth or humanity. The French have a good word to describe her: pénible.

John Hickenlooper: He was the most sensible candidate on display tonight. He kept insisting that the Democrats can’t defeat Donald Trump if they appear to be running as socialists. I hope he’s right.

I suspect that Hickenlooper won’t have many more opportunities to voice this concern in future debates.

Andrew Yang: Though short on political skill, the tech executive has some interesting ideas. However, he was given few opportunities to express them. Between the bias of the moderators and the aggressiveness of his competitors, Yang was basically frozen out of the debate.

Michael Bennet: He seemed like the most decent guy on the stage. Unfortunately, he appeared to be overwhelmed by the occasion during the first half of the debate. He rallied later on, but remains a no-hoper.

Eric Swalwell: Pénible is a good description of him, too. He had the best night of the no-hopers, though.

Swalwell held himself out as the youth candidate. He quoted Joe Biden from 30 years ago talking about the torch being passed to a new generation. (True to form, Biden had pinched that line from John Kennedy). Now, said Swalwell, it’s his turn to carry the torch.

But you can’t be the torch carrier when you’re at less than 1 percent in the polls. Swalwell made an impression tonight, but when the dust settles, he’s likely to be at around 1 percent.

Marianne Williamson: The spiritual adviser was spirited. If nominated, she plans to make her race with Trump a duel between love and hate. Which will triumph? We will never find out.

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.