Bret Stephens, writing in the Jerusalem Post, points to improving coverage of the Arab-Israeli conflict in America’s mainstream press. He identifies several reasons for the change, including public pressure by pro-Israel groups as well as President Bush’s aggressive pro-democracy position. I think an equally important factor has been the unrelenting critique emanating from America’s non-mainstream media, especially internet-based news sources. The dominant media simply can’t monopolize discourse as they could only a few years ago, and when they take positions that are unsupportable, they get hammered. I think it is impossible to overestimate the complacency of mainstream reporters and editors; they would have been happy to continue reporting the Middle East as a case of peace-process devotees in both Israel and Palestine being undermined by “extremists” on both sides, had they been able to get away with it.
- Subscribe now!... Get rid of ADs!Support Power Line...VIP MembershipPresentsPower Line
2016 Power Line Picks
Most Read on Power Line
- There's something about Hillary's health
- Meet the black Charlotte police officer who shot Keith Lamont Scott
- What the NFL Can Teach Washington About Social Policy
- The Economy in Pictures
- Glenn Kessler illustrates why moderators shouldn't "fact check"
- The National Anthem: a tale of two football teams
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Find us on Facebook
“Arise and take our stand for freedom as in the olden time.” Winston Churchill
“Proclaim Liberty throughout All the land unto All the Inhabitants Thereof.” Inscription on the Liberty Bell