Stanton Brown, one of our perceptive readers, alerted me to an argument in favor of quota-style Title IX enforcement with which I was unfamiliar. Apparently, an AP writer named Steve Wilstein thinks that Title IX needs to become even more stringent because women’s pro sports are not as popular as men’s. This argument leads Brown to reflect as follows: “The complete absence of intelligent discourse on Title IX has reached looking glass proportions. It is beyond curiouser. Wilstein is content to have the government discriminate against millions of boys because he thinks the discrimination will enhance the profitability of women
-
-
Most Read on Power Line
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.