Martha Stewart has been convicted on all of the counts that went to the jury: conspiracy, obstruction and making false statements to investigators. The most novel charge against Stewart–that her proclamations of innocence, in response to leaks about the investigation, constituted securities fraud–was thrown out by the trial judge.
I’m a fan of Martha, and am sorry to see her convicted. While she was not charged with insider trading, that was the essence of the case against her. It seems probable that she and her stockbroker did panic and lie to investigators. But the insider trading laws are, in my view, highly problematic, and the penalty Martha will now pay seems grossly disproportionate to her offense, as was the magnitude of the effort made by prosecutors to bring her down. There is no percentage in being a high-profile criminal defendant.
-
-
Donate to PL
-
Our Favorites
- American Greatness
- American Mind
- American Story
- American Thinker
- Aspen beat
- Babylon Bee
- Belmont Club
- Churchill Project
- Claremont Institute
- Daily Torch
- Federalist
- Gatestone Institute
- Hollywood in Toto
- Hoover Institution
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- InstaPundit
- Jewish World Review
- Law & Liberty
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty Daily
- Lileks
- Lucianne
- Michael Ramirez Cartoons
- Michelle Malkin
- Pipeline
- RealClearPolitics
- Ricochet
- Steyn Online
- Tim Blair
Media
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Temporarily disabled
Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.