The New York Times reports on President Bush’s selection of a nominee to replace Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. It turns out, though, that there isn’t any real news to report. The Times says that Bush is “closing in on a nominee,” but several possibilities are still under consideration, and the Times’ account contains little or nothing that is new.
The point of the Times story seems to be to discourage the administration from nominating Ted Olson, whom the paper describes as a “staunch partisan.” The Times rehashes controversies from the 1990s in which Olson was marginally involved, and goes to Senators Schumer and Leahy for comment.
Schumer says that Ted Olson wouldn’t be on “a list of consensus nominees.” No kidding! In today’s Washington atmosphere, it is hard to imagine what a list of “consensus nominees” might consist of, but we can be sure that no one with any credentials as a Republican would be on it.
Leahy says that Bush should nominate someone “independent” who “will act as an independent check on this administration
- Subscribe now!... Get rid of ADs!Support Power Line...VIP MembershipPresentsPower Line
Most Read on Power Line
- Another reason why Hillary Clinton does not deserve to be president
- A Police-Involved Shooting In Omaha
- More evidence that the criminal justice system is too lenient
- Is Hillary's Candidacy Just Another Business Deal?
- Obama expounds the limits of Iran's anti-Semitism
- Washington Post Attacks Rubio: He's Not Rich!
Subscribe to Power Line by Email
Find us on Facebook
“Arise and take our stand for freedom as in the olden time.” Winston Churchill
“Proclaim Liberty throughout All the land unto All the Inhabitants Thereof.” Inscription on the Liberty Bell