Was it something I asked?

The Minnesota Department of Health originally included me in its daily press briefings upon my request. They sent me notices with the call-in information, they took my questions by email, and they provided written responses. My questions focused on the nursing home crisis implicit in the data. I wondered why Governor Walz had instituted a statewide shutdown when the crisis involved a limited at-risk population.

On April 27 I submitted this question by email following the briefing: “Referring to the 286 total deaths to date, [I note that] every decedent under age 70 has died in long-term care or similar setting. The youngest person to die outside long-term care was in his 70’s. Why is it necessary to close the schools and shut down the state to protect the at-risk population?” I posted MDH press officer Doug Schultz’s response to my question verbatim in part 24 of my series.

The Department of Health has excluded me from the daily briefings since April 27. MDH press officers have failed to respond to any of my messages asking why they have cut me off. Nothing. Zip. Nada. The sound of silence.

On May 4 I filed a Minnesota Data Practices Act request with Governor Walz and Health Commissioner Jan Malcolm seeking documents bearing on my exclusion from the daily briefings. Yesterday I received Governor Walz’s response to my Data Practices Act request. I have embedded it below via Scribd.

It is completely unilluminating except in one respect. On page 8 MDH press officer Michael Schommer forwards my question (the one quoted above) to Jeremy Drucker and Emmalynn Bauer in Governor Walz’s office. Schommer’s message reads: “Flagging as an FYI for future discussion.”

I draw the following inferences. My exclusion from the MDH briefings comes after consultation with Governor Walz’s office. They didn’t like the question(s) I was asking. They knew not to put the reason for my exclusion in writing and have withheld it from me because it is unflattering to Governor Walz. It would not make him look good.

Responsive Data Redacted by Scott Johnson on Scribd

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.