Thought for the day

Our own Steven Hayward with a truth blast in the New York Post:

Normal human beings not handicapped by a contempora[ry] college education may be wondering why the pro-Hamas academics coming out of the woodwork make their chief complaint that Jews are “colonizers.”

It has long been tiresome to review the lengthy history of Jews living in “Judea” (as the Romans called the Holy Land when they occupied it) centuries before Islam was a gleam in Muhammad’s eye, not to mention the 20th-century international mandate to restore a Jewish homeland after centuries of occupation by the Ottoman Empire and other previous “colonizers” or Israel’s complete withdrawal from Gaza more than 15 years ago, after which Gaza decided self-government meant empowering Hamas.

Nor does it do any good to point out the entirety of human history is one of invasion and conquest and virtually no nation or ethnic group, including especially Jews, is without a history of conquest by a hostile or opportunistic neighbor.

Indeed, William the Conqueror was a “colonizer” in the 1066 Norman Conquest.

None of the history or legal claims about the Middle East matters to the braying mob of campus antisemites because the “colonizer” charge isn’t about occupation, colonialism or a dispute about dividing up the historic land of Israel at all.

Colonialism, or its parent category “imperialism,” is the all-purpose charge Lenin developed a century ago to explain the failure of Marxist historical predictions and supply a new rationale for whipping up radical enthusiasm for revolution.

In practice it is a means of delegitimizing capitalism and sanctifying resentment of successful groups like Jews, Asians and whites generally (hence the related term ubiquitous on campus, “white supremacy”).

Despite centuries of persecution and repeated pogroms like Oct. 7, Jews persist as a supremely successful ethnic group, “overrepresented” (campus terminology, again) in the ranks of Nobel Prize winners, scientists and most elite professions including, ironically, academia, though this appears to be quickly changing.

Back in the 1920s and 1930s, Ivy League colleges openly and explicitly discriminated against Jews, putting in writing that they didn’t want “too many Jews” in their student bodies.

It is likely no coincidence the percentage of Jewish students in the student bodies of elite colleges has been declining rapidly in recent years alongside the rise in academic antisemitism.

The creed of the increasingly influential “diversity, equity and inclusion” movement has given the green light to hate Jews openly, discriminate against Asians and demonize whites.

One of the ironies of the campus critics of “colonizing” is how fully they have colonized with their identity-based dogma nearly every academic discipline in our colleges and universities.

Whole thing here.

Notice: All comments are subject to moderation. Our comments are intended to be a forum for civil discourse bearing on the subject under discussion. Commenters who stray beyond the bounds of civility or employ what we deem gratuitous vulgarity in a comment — including, but not limited to, “s***,” “f***,” “a*******,” or one of their many variants — will be banned without further notice in the sole discretion of the site moderator.

Responses